Soluzioni concordate delle crisi di impresa e autonomia privata

« articolo precedente | articolo successivo »

Campo DC	Valore
dc.identifier	ECF_article_313
dc.title	Soluzioni concordate delle crisi di impresa e autonomia privata
dc.contributor.author	Ferri Giuseppe jr.
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing
dc.type	Articolo
dc.language.iso	it
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/it/edizioni4/riviste/ricerche-giuridiche/2015/2/soluzioni-concordate-delle-crisi-di-impresa-e-auto/
dc.description.abstract	In this conference paper, the author reviews the main rationales and goals of insolvency proceedings and broadly compares insolvency proceedings to contractual private ordering of insolvency. The author stresses how the position of unsecured creditors in insolvency proceedings tends to be protected only in a collective way, through procedural rules that allow to deviate from absolute priority rule, whereas contractual solutions of distressed firms are the domain of contract, with some variations (mainly, the oversight of the court) due to the multiple interests involved in situations in which these contracts are entered into.
dc.relation.ispartof	Ricerche giuridiche
dc.relation.ispartof	Vol. 4 \| Num. 2 \| Dicembre 2015
dc.issued	2015-12-30
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.eissn	2281-6100
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.identifier.doi	10.14277/2281-6100/RG-4-2-15-1
dc.peer-review	yes

Articolo
open access peer reviewed

Giuseppe jr. Ferri Università di Roma Tor Vergata

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

In this conference paper, the author reviews the main rationales and goals of insolvency proceedings and broadly compares insolvency proceedings to contractual private ordering of insolvency. The author stresses how the position of unsecured creditors in insolvency proceedings tends to be protected only in a collective way, through procedural rules that allow to deviate from absolute priority rule, whereas contractual solutions of distressed firms are the domain of contract, with some variations (mainly, the oversight of the court) due to the multiple interests involved in situations in which these contracts are entered into.

Pubblicato

30 Dicembre 2015

Lingua

permalink http://doi.org/10.14277/2281-6100/RG-4-2-15-1

Copyright: © 2015 Giuseppe jr. Ferri. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Citazioni verso questo capitolo

How to cite