Antiquity Studies

Series | Antiquity Studies
Edited book | ΦΑΙΔΙΜΟΣ ΕΚΤΩΡ
Chapter | Pind. fr. 321 Sn.-Maehl. delendum

Pind. fr. 321 Sn.-Maehl. delendum

Abstract

Thanks to a re-edition of the main lexicographical source that transmits Pindar, fr. 321 Sn.-Maehl., i.e. Etym. Gen. AB s.v. δαῦλος, which offers the reading τετείχισται instead of the vulgate τετείχηται, this paper cautiously argues for a full deletion of that fragment from the corpus of the Pindaric fragments, and suggests, as already surmised by various scholars, that the correct reference be to Pind. Pyth. 6.9 or Isthm. 5.44, both of which present the form τετείχισται. Therefore, if this suggestion is accepted, the ‘former’ Pindaric fragment numbered as 321 should be added as a further testimonium for one or both of these lines from the aforementioned Pindaric odes.


Open access

Submitted: May 17, 2021 | Accepted: June 23, 2021 | Published Dec. 16, 2021 | Language: it

Keywords Pindar • Fragmentary poetry • Etymologica • Critical editions • Lexicography

Copyright © 2021 Stefano Vecchiato. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-548-3/012


read this chapter


chevron_left chevron_right

downloadfile_download

  • file_download 17
  • search 181
  • format_quote 0