Series | Antiquity Studies
Edited book | ΦΑΙΔΙΜΟΣ ΕΚΤΩΡ
Chapter | Typhoeus and Etna in Hesiod, Pindar, and (Pseudo-)Aeschylus
Abstract
This paper discusses the suspected reading †ἀïδνῆς in Hes. Theog. 860 and proposes the emendation οὔρεος ἐν βήσσῃς, <ε>ἰν Αἴτνῃ παιπαλοέσσῃ. The interpretative consequences of thus introducing into the text a reference to Mount Etna are then explored. The immediately following passage, ll. 861-867, is reinterpreted in the light of a preceding reference to the Sicilian volcano. Not only Hesiod, but also Homer is argued to have knowledge of volcanism. Hesiod’s simple, unelaborated reference to Typhoeus’ defeat at Mount Etna implies that the association of Typhoeus with Mount Etna was made by Greeks before Hesiod; it can plausibly be connected to Greek colonising or proto-colonising activity in the eighth century BCE. The Typhonomachy would be only one of several mythological episodes in early Greek hexameter poetry to be localised in the West. Finally, the arguable presence of the Typhoeus-Etna link in Hesiod’s Theogony significantly increases the likelihood that the closely related descriptions of Typhoeus in passages of Pindar (from Pyth. 1, Pyth. 8, Ol. 4, and frr. 92-3 Maehler) and the (Pseudo-)Aeschylean Prometheus Bound do not depend on each other, but on a lost early hexameter account of the Typhonomachy (perhaps, but not necessarily, the Cyclical Titanomachy) that had attained canonical status by the fifth century BCE. Thus also one popular argument for a late dating of the Prometheus Bound, and for its non-Aeschylean authorship, would need to be discarded.
Submitted: May 17, 2021 | Accepted: June 23, 2021 | Published Dec. 16, 2021 | Language: en
Keywords Volcanism • Hesiod • Prometheus Bound • The Greek West • Sicily • Mount Etna • Typhonomachy • Pindar
Copyright © 2021 Bruno Currie. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-548-3/004
In limine
Poesia esametrica arcaica
Lirica
Tragedia
Poesia ellenistica tarda
Prosa
Poesia latina
Linguistica e storia degli studi
A mo’ di conclusione
DC Field | Value |
---|---|
dc.identifier |
ECF_chapter_6524 |
dc.contributor.author |
Currie Bruno |
dc.title |
Typhoeus and Etna in Hesiod, Pindar, and (Pseudo-)Aeschylus |
dc.type |
Chapter |
dc.language.iso |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
This paper discusses the suspected reading †ἀïδνῆς in Hes. Theog. 860 and proposes the emendation οὔρεος ἐν βήσσῃς, <ε>ἰν Αἴτνῃ παιπαλοέσσῃ. The interpretative consequences of thus introducing into the text a reference to Mount Etna are then explored. The immediately following passage, ll. 861-867, is reinterpreted in the light of a preceding reference to the Sicilian volcano. Not only Hesiod, but also Homer is argued to have knowledge of volcanism. Hesiod’s simple, unelaborated reference to Typhoeus’ defeat at Mount Etna implies that the association of Typhoeus with Mount Etna was made by Greeks before Hesiod; it can plausibly be connected to Greek colonising or proto-colonising activity in the eighth century BCE. The Typhonomachy would be only one of several mythological episodes in early Greek hexameter poetry to be localised in the West. Finally, the arguable presence of the Typhoeus-Etna link in Hesiod’s Theogony significantly increases the likelihood that the closely related descriptions of Typhoeus in passages of Pindar (from Pyth. 1, Pyth. 8, Ol. 4, and frr. 92-3 Maehler) and the (Pseudo-)Aeschylean Prometheus Bound do not depend on each other, but on a lost early hexameter account of the Typhonomachy (perhaps, but not necessarily, the Cyclical Titanomachy) that had attained canonical status by the fifth century BCE. Thus also one popular argument for a late dating of the Prometheus Bound, and for its non-Aeschylean authorship, would need to be discarded. |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Antiquity Studies |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Filologia e letteratura |
dc.publisher |
Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari |
dc.issued |
2021-12-16 |
dc.dateAccepted |
2021-06-23 |
dc.dateSubmitted |
2021-05-17 |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-549-0/typhoeus-and-etna-in-hesiod-pindar-and-pseudo-aesc/ |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.30687/978-88-6969-548-3/004 |
dc.identifier.issn |
2610-8828 |
dc.identifier.eissn |
2610-9344 |
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-88-6969-549-0 |
dc.identifier.eisbn |
978-88-6969-548-3 |
dc.rights |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
item.fulltext |
with fulltext |
item.grantfulltext |
open |
dc.peer-review |
no |
dc.subject |
Hesiod |
dc.subject |
Hesiod |
dc.subject |
Mount Etna |
dc.subject |
Mount Etna |
dc.subject |
Pindar |
dc.subject |
Pindar |
dc.subject |
Prometheus Bound |
dc.subject |
Prometheus Bound |
dc.subject |
Sicily |
dc.subject |
Sicily |
dc.subject |
The Greek West |
dc.subject |
The Greek West |
dc.subject |
Typhonomachy |
dc.subject |
Typhonomachy |
dc.subject |
Volcanism |
dc.subject |
Volcanism |
Download data |
Edizioni Ca’ Foscari
Dorsoduro 3246
30123 Venezia
ecf@unive.it
T +39 041 234 8250
Evologi srl
P.IVA 04616450260