The Controversial Rise of Skilled Intentionality

« previous chapter | next chapter »

Iscriviti alla newsletter

DC Field	Value
dc.identifier	ECF_chapter_15678
dc.contributor.author	Valenti Riccardo
dc.title	The Controversial Rise of Skilled Intentionality. Reconsidering Hylonoetic Agency in Malafouris’ Material Engagement Theory
dc.type	Chapter
dc.language.iso	en
dc.description.abstract	In this paper some features of ‘skilled intentionality’ are considered. It is specified what has to be intended for Material Engagement Theory and why Malafouris’ formulation of it deserves a prominent role. Then, it is indicated how the transition from the holomorphic theory to the hylonoetic one is prepared in his works. In the third paragraph, Malafouris’ approach is partially criticised by confronting his theses with Bergson’s. In the final section, the criticism is made more explicit, considering the case of the Acheulan hand axe’s symmetry.
dc.relation.ispartof	Quaderni di Venezia Arti
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Venice University Press, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.issued	2022-12-21
dc.dateSubmitted	2022-11-08
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-675-6/the-controversial-rise-of-skilled-intentionality/
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/978-88-6969-675-6/007
dc.identifier.eissn	2784-8868
dc.identifier.isbn
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-88-6969-675-6
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
item.fulltext	with fulltext
item.grantfulltext	open
dc.peer-review	no
dc.subject	Blind man’s stick
dc.subject	Field
dc.subject	Knapping
dc.subject	Malafouris
dc.subject	Skill

Chapter
open access

The Controversial Rise of Skilled Intentionality

Reconsidering Hylonoetic Agency in Malafouris’ Material Engagement Theory

Riccardo Valenti Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia, Italia; Université de Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, France

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

In this paper some features of ‘skilled intentionality’ are considered. It is specified what has to be intended for Material Engagement Theory and why Malafouris’ formulation of it deserves a prominent role. Then, it is indicated how the transition from the holomorphic theory to the hylonoetic one is prepared in his works. In the third paragraph, Malafouris’ approach is partially criticised by confronting his theses with Bergson’s. In the final section, the criticism is made more explicit, considering the case of the Acheulan hand axe’s symmetry.

Published

Dec. 21, 2022

Submitted

Nov. 8, 2022

Language

ISBN (EBOOK)

978-88-6969-675-6

Keywords: Field • Skill • Blind man’s stick • Malafouris • Knapping

permalink: http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-675-6/007

Copyright: © 2022 Riccardo Valenti. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

References to this chapter

How to cite