Le nuove forme di integrazione tra imprese

« previous article | next article »

DC Field	Value
dc.identifier	ECF_article_458
dc.title	Le nuove forme di integrazione tra imprese. Dai contratti di rete ai gruppi paritetici (e ritorno)
dc.contributor.author	Onza Maurizio
dc.contributor.author	Salamone Luigi
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing
dc.type	Research Article
dc.language.iso	it
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/riviste/ricerche-giuridiche/2012/2/le-nuove-forme-di-integrazione-tra-imprese/
dc.description.abstract	Financial markets are a reality in continuous becoming. Faced with this mobility scenario, the financial legal order reacts in a peculiar way, reviewing roles and weights of the functions exercised by the legislature, by the administrative Authority (Consob) and by the judicial intervention. In this articulated context, we must ask about the role of the precedent law cases. In fact, Consob has not only a regulatory function but also plays an interpretation rule similar to that exercised by the judge. In this way, Consob is more responsive to change and therefore is able to provide a more prompt and adequate response to interpretation than can be done, in certain cases, by the court, especially through the regulatory instrument of soft law.
dc.relation.ispartof	Ricerche giuridiche
dc.relation.ispartof	Vol. 1 \| Issue 2 \| December 2012
dc.issued	2012-12-20
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.eissn	2281-6100
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.identifier.doi	10.14277/2281-6100/RG-1-2-12-1
dc.peer-review	yes

Research Article
open access peer reviewed

Dai contratti di rete ai gruppi paritetici (e ritorno)

Maurizio Onza

Luigi Salamone -

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

Financial markets are a reality in continuous becoming. Faced with this mobility scenario, the financial legal order reacts in a peculiar way, reviewing roles and weights of the functions exercised by the legislature, by the administrative Authority (Consob) and by the judicial intervention. In this articulated context, we must ask about the role of the precedent law cases. In fact, Consob has not only a regulatory function but also plays an interpretation rule similar to that exercised by the judge. In this way, Consob is more responsive to change and therefore is able to provide a more prompt and adequate response to interpretation than can be done, in certain cases, by the court, especially through the regulatory instrument of soft law.

Published

Dec. 20, 2012

Language

permalink http://doi.org/10.14277/2281-6100/RG-1-2-12-1

Copyright: © 2012 Maurizio Onza, Luigi Salamone. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

References to this chapter

How to cite