RIDAO
East-Asian Law Journal open access | peer reviewed
Aims & Scope
Recent years have witnessed a great development of East Asian studies in Italy (China and Japan above all, but also Korea, Vietnam and other South East Asian nations) in a plurality of fields. The study of the law of these countries, for a long time carried out by a small group of specialists, is finding more and more space and interest in the academy, but also in the professional world. As things stand at present, however, there is a lack of a 'place' where scholars can channel their research: area journals are traditionally far removed from law, while law journals are guilty of a certain closure towards countries perceived in a vaguely Orientalist manner as distant or exotic. The Rivista di Diritto dell’Asia Orientale (RIDAO) intends to fill this gap, providing space for research that can combine solid expertise in law with the knowledge and cultural respect proper to area studies. The Review's scientific committee is composed of recognised Italian and foreign experts, whose expertise covers various geographical areas and research topics (civil law, commercial law, dispute resolution, etc.). It brings together scholars representing the various academic schools that have developed in Italy in recent decades. The Journal, which is planned to be published annually, intends to comply with the strictest standards of academic excellence in the selection and evaluation of contributions, which will mainly include in-depth scientific and doctrinal essays, but also short articles, case notes, and translations of legislative and administrative documents from the countries under consideration, and reviews of volumes and monographs. The contributions will be published in Italian or English.
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/RIDAO/4713-223X | e-ISSN 3035-5591 | Periodicity annual | Language en, it
Copyright This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
- 37 download 218 search
- The Governance of Reproductive Contingencies between Italy and Japan
- Stefania Pia Perrino
- Jan. 16, 2025 | Genere e uguaglianza nel contesto dei diritti dell’Asia Orientale
- 34 download 213 search
- La privazione della propria individualità: analisi sugli sviluppi della legge sul singolo patronimico per le coppie sposate in Giappone
- Virginia Lemme
- Dec. 18, 2024 | Genere e uguaglianza nel contesto dei diritti dell’Asia Orientale
- 33 download 164 search
- “Not Illegal, but not either legal”: The Grey Zone of Reproductive Rights in South Korea
- Laura Alessandra Nocera
- Dec. 18, 2024 | Genere e uguaglianza nel contesto dei diritti dell’Asia Orientale
- 20 download 68 search
- Premessa
- Redazione RIDAO
- Dec. 18, 2024 | Genere e uguaglianza nel contesto dei diritti dell’Asia Orientale
- 29 download 82 search
- Introduzione | Introduction
- Renzo Cavalieri, Giorgio Fabio Colombo, Giuliano Lemme
- Dec. 18, 2024 | Genere e uguaglianza nel contesto dei diritti dell’Asia Orientale
- 27 download 172 search
- The Protection of Transgender Workers in China: Between Law and Society
- Valeria Fappani
- Dec. 18, 2024 | Genere e uguaglianza nel contesto dei diritti dell’Asia Orientale
- 47 download 331 search
- Regulating Same-Sex Marriage in Vietnam
- Van Phuc Nguyen
- Dec. 18, 2024 | Genere e uguaglianza nel contesto dei diritti dell’Asia Orientale
- 33 download 166 search
- Violenza di genere tra le mura domestiche: Repubblica Popolare Cinese e Taiwan
- Sara D’Attoma
- Dec. 18, 2024 | Genere e uguaglianza nel contesto dei diritti dell’Asia Orientale
- 21 download 116 search
- The Role of Ta-Li-Yuan’s Judicial Practice in the Early Republic of China from the Perspective of Women’s Rights Protection
- Keming Liu
- Dec. 18, 2024 | Genere e uguaglianza nel contesto dei diritti dell’Asia Orientale
- 40 download 778 search
- Genere e uguaglianza nel contesto dei diritti dell’Asia Orientale
- Jan. 16, 2025
Renzo Cavalieri, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia
Giorgio Fabio Colombo, Nagoya University Graduate School of Law, Japan; Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia
Giuliano Lemme, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Italia
Advisory Board
Jong-Chol An, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia
Riccardo Cardilli, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Italia
Anling Fei, China University of Political Science and Law, China
Masao Kotani, Ochanomizu University, Japan
Simona Novaretti, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italia
Michela Riminucci, Kobe University, Japan
Marina Timoteo, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Italia
Editorial Board
Sara D’Attoma, Università degli Studi di Verona, Italia; Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia
Virginia Lemme, Università degli Studi di Siena, Italia
Noemi Mazzaracchio, Nanjing University, China
Leonardo Luca Pastore, Università degli Studi di Udine, Italia; Università degli Studi di Trieste, Italia
Giulia Aurora Radice, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia
Giulio Santoni, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Italia
Sonia Sforza, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia
Davide Luigi Totaro, Hitotsubashi University, Japan; Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia
Managing Editor
Alberto Urbani, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia
Peer Reviewers Board
Federico Roberto Antonelli, Istituto Italiano di Cultura di Pechino, China
Jun Ashida, National Diet Library, Japan
Anna Eirini Baka, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia
Martina Baradel, University of Oxford, UK
Carla Bassu, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Italia
Salvatore Casabona, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Italia
Ignazio Castellucci, Università degli Studi di Teramo, Italia
Sara De Vido, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia
Laura Formichella, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Italia
Ivan Franceschini, The University of Melbourne, Australia
Marco Giorgi, Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Italia
Michele Graziadei, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italia
Hiroko Iko, Muroran Institute of Technology, Japan
Béatrice Jaluzot, Sciences Po Lyon, France
Carol Lawson, The University of Tokyo, Japan
Xiangsen Li, Nanjing Audit University, China
Pietro Lo Iacono, Libera Università Maria Santissima Assunta, Roma, Italia
Fabrizio Marrella, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia
Takeshi Matsuda, Osaka University, Japan
Mauro Mazza, Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Italia
Huang Meilin, Principal legal officer at Unidroit, Italia
Andrea Monti, Università degli Studi «G. d’Annunzio» Chieti-Pescara, Italia
Maria Federica Moscati, University of Sussex, UK
Si Jin Oh, Kangwon National University, South Korea
Andrea Ortolani, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Giovanni Pisacane, GWA Studio Legale
Monika Prusinowska, Universitat de Barcelona, Espanya
Tao Qian, China University of Political Science and Law, China
Gianmatteo Sabatino, Istituto Italo-Cinese - Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, China; Università degli Studi di Trento, Italia
Gianluca Scarchillo, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, Italia
Lee Seokmin, Soongsil University, South Korea
Andrea Serafino, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Italia
Franco Serena, Nihon University, Japan
Jeemin Song, Kyonggi University, Suwon, South Korea
Yoko Tamura, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Enrico Toti, Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Italia
Dimitri Vanoverbeke, The University of Tokyo, Japan
Barbara Verri, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Italia
Will Wang, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Italia
Leon Wolff, Hitotsubashi University, Japan
Lihong Zhang, East China University of Political Science and Law, China
Use the form to submit a proposal.
Submit a proposalinput
The article processing charges are regulated by the Publisher. For more information please visit: Publish with us.
Every article published by ECF was accepted for publication by no less than two qualified reviewers as a result of a process of anonymous reviewing (double-blind peer review). The reviewers are independent of the authors and not affiliated with the same institution.
The Journal’s Editors-in-Chief guarantees the proper execution of the peer review process for every article published in the Journal.
Peer review policies for the different sections:
- Complete volume/issue: subject to peer review
- Monographs/essays/articles: subject to peer review
- Introductions, prefaces: no peer review
- Reviews: no peer review
- Editorials: no peer review
The Journal adopts an author-year in-text reference system which requires: (1) in-text citation in the main text in round brackets (Last name publication year, pages), i.e., parenthetical referencing system in body of text; (2) a bibliography in the final part of the contribution, according to the following format: Last name, First name [bulleted] (year). Title. Subtitle. Place: Publisher.
- Ex.: Rossi, M. (1987). The drafting of standards on the use of hydrogen. Venezia: Edizioni Aperte.
The above mentioned in-text reference system applies to scholarly works or articles, while normative or legal cases references should be cited in a footnote.
To ensure scientific accuracy and precise identification of the texts and materials cited, bibliographic references should follow the following guidelines:
- Indication of author’s name in roman alphabet (e.g., pinyin, rōmaji) and in ‘original characters’, e.g., Chinese characters, hangeul or Japanese writing system (i.e., kanji, hiragana, katakana) in square brackets.
- Indication of the title of book or article should be translated into Italian or English, depending on whether the contribution is in Italian or English, while, in square brackets, the transliteration in roman alphabet as well as the tile in ‘original characters’ (e.g., again, Chinese characters, hangeul or Japanese writing system), should be provided.
- Transliteration of journal name in roman alphabet (translation is not required) and in square brackets in ‘original characters’.
- Indication of place of publication as internationally known (Beijing, Seoul, Tokyo, etc.).
- Indication of publishing house in roman alphabet.
- Indication of judgments in compliance with the style adopted in the individual jurisdiction (cf. see specific examples for China and Japan), and providing with the relevant translation into Italian or English of the judicial authority and/or the parties.
- Indication of normative act in Italian or English translation, date of promulgation in round brackets, followed, in square brackets, by a transliteration in roman alphabet and with ‘original characters’ next to it. Add any specific information facilitating the consultation of the normative act.
For the sake of clarity, reference will be made to the legal systems of the People's Republic of China and Japan. Consider these guidelines adoptable, mutatis mutandis, for the other jurisdictions of the East Asian context.
Below examples of citations from scholarly works and provisions of the legal system of the People’s Republic of China and legal systems and entities that use the Chinese language as their official language (so, with due differences [use of traditional Chinese, possibility of non-pinyin phonetic transcription], consider these indications valid for sources from Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan and Singapore):
Citation from manual/book/volume
Lü Pin [吕频] (2011). Report on Domestic Violence Prevention Activities in China [Zhongguo fanjiatingbaoli xingdong baogao, 中国反家庭暴力行动报告]. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.
Journal citation
Xu Liqin [许丽琴] (2009). “Analysis on the Divorce Compensation System” [Lihun sunhai peichang zhidu tanxi, 离婚损害赔偿制度探析]. Faxue zazhi [法学杂志], 30(4), 109-11.
Judgement
Huang XX vs. Zhao XX, civil judgment of first instance, Civil Chamber of the People's Court of the Central District of Jinan City, Shandong Province, no. 2816/2011 [Huang XX on Zhao XX lihun jiufen an (2011) Shi min chuzi di 2816 hao, Shan-dong sheng Jinan shi shizhong qu renmin fayuan, 黄某某诉赵某某离婚纠 纷案, (2011) 市民初字第 2816 号, 山东省济南市市中区人民法院].
Normative act
PRC Marriage Law (1950) [Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo hunyinfa, 中华人民共和国婚姻法].
Below examples of citations from scholarly works and provisions of the legal system of JAPAN
Textbook citation
Hatoyama H. [鳩山秀夫] (1955). The Principle of Good Faith in the Law of Obligations [Saiken-hō ni okeru shingiseijitsunogensoku, 債権法における信義誠実の原則], Tokyo: Yūhikaku.
Journal citation
Yoshimi S. [好美清光] (1962). “The Function of ‘Treu und Glauben’” [Shingisoku no kinō ni tsuite, 信 義則の機能について]. Hitotsubashironsō [一橋論叢], 47(2), 181-98.
Judgement
NB: It is not required to name the parties of the case
- Supreme Court of Japan, April 15, 1969, 民集 Minshū 23, 755.
- Tokyo District Court, December 13, 1961, 判例時報 Hanrei Jihō 286 (1962) 25.
Act on Special Provisions to the Civil Code Concerning Electronic Consumer Contract (2001) [Denshi shōhi-sha keiyaku ni kansuru Minpō no tokurei ni kansuru hōritsu, 電子消費者契約に関する民法の特例に関する法律], Law No. 95/2001, Art. X.
- Headings and titles. Capitalize words in a heading or title, including the initial word and any word that immediately follows a colon. Do not capitalize articles, conjunctions, or prepositions when they are four or fewer letters, unless they begin the heading/title, or immediately follow a colon.
- Internet main page titles and URLs. Capitalize URLs and words in an Internet main page title in accordance with the actual capitalization of the source.
- Additional words that should be capitalized in legal writing include:
- Nouns that identify specific persons, officials, groups, government offices, or government bodies. These words and phrases should always be capitalized. E.g.:
- the Social Security Administrator: The plaintiff was declared disabled by the Social Security Administrator and was awarded benefits.
- the President: A sitting President’s executive power allows him or her to pardon convicted criminals.
- Exceptions. Certain words are exceptions to the above rule and should be capitalized according to the following rules:
- Act: capitalize when referring to a specific legislative act. E.g.: A union has a statutory duty of fair representation under the National Labor Relations Act.
- Code: capitalize when referring to a specific code. E.g.: Considering the change between the 1929 and 2020 Codes, […].
- Constitution: capitalize when naming any constitution in full, but do not capitalize the adjective form ‘constitutional’.
- Court: capitalize when naming any court in full.
- Judge, Justice: capitalize when giving the name of a specific judge or justice or when referring to a Justice of the Supreme Court of the related jurisdiction.
- State: capitalize if it is a part of the full title of a state, if the word it modifies is capitalized, or when referring to a state as a governmental actor or as a party to a litigation.
For cases not explicitly covered by the editorial guidelines of the journal, please refer to the criteria provided by The Bluebook. A Uniform System of Citation.
We are delighted to announce the Call for Papers for the Rivista di Diritto dell’Asia Orientale (RIDAO) on the topic “Environment, Sustainability and Law in East Asia”. Scholars and experts from various disciplines are invited to join.
In recent years, the study of East Asia (primarily China and Japan, but also Korea, Vietnam, and other Southeast Asian countries) has significantly developed in Italy, covering a broad range of subjects. In response to this growing interest, RIDAO aims to provide a platform for research that combines legal expertise with the cultural awareness typical of area studies. The journal's scientific committee is composed of esteemed Italian and international scholars, drawing on a wide range of geographic and legal research expertise. Moreover, an effort has been made to represent the various academic schools that have emerged in Italy in recent decades, with the ambition of creating a diverse and dynamic scientific ecosystem.
Topic
The protection of the ‘right to the future’ for new generations, environmental sustainability, and climate crisis management are among the most pressing legal challenges of the new millennium, affecting both private and public law. The devastating humanitarian and economic consequences of climate change have prompted even traditionally less proactive East Asian legal systems to reassess their policies and rethink the regulatory frameworks available for protecting the environment, biodiversity, and sustainability in the Anthropocene era.
Since the 1970s, the region’s rapid economic growth has led to an unprecedented increase in urbanization and a sharp rise in ecological footprints across the Asia-Pacific area. This economic miracle has propelled countries such as China, South Korea, and Japan into leading global roles. However, the increasing severity of global warming-related phenomena and the region’s vulnerability to extreme climatic events have heightened awareness and promoted common political and scientific initiatives to tackle the climate challenge of the 21st century.
Given this context, the study of environmental law in East Asia has become a fertile research field, allowing scholars to explore the intersections of law, culture, and society in addressing modern challenges. Furthermore, the cross-cutting and pervasive nature of environmental sustainability in contemporary and future legal and societal frameworks calls for broad legal reflection and the adoption of a multidisciplinary perspective.
East Asia accounts for over 50% of global greenhouse gas emissions. As a highly industrialized region with complex and often conflicting geopolitical interests, where poverty reduction remains a priority for many policymakers, the study of environmental law takes on significant comparative and scientific relevance. The diverse and heterogeneous legal experiences in Asia reflect varying approaches and sensitivities, shaped by the structural, institutional, and cultural characteristics of each legal system.
Scope of the Publication
We welcome original contributions that adopt a comparative legal approach to Law and Environmental Sustainability, addressing its various aspects, disciplines, challenges, and recent developments within the legal systems of East Asian countries (e.g., China, Japan, Korea, Vietnam, and other Southeast Asian nations).
Particularly, we encourage studies related to the following sub-themes:
- Environmental regulations and public policies;
- Law, green transition, and renewable energy;
- Environmental damage, subjective rights, and collective interests;
- Legal Aid and environmental sustainability in East Asia;
- Environmental due diligence;
- Resource management and access;
- Law and climate change;
- Insurance and natural disasters;
- Biodiversity and species protection;
- Right to a healthy environment and future generations;
- Circular economy and waste management, including nuclear energy disposal;
- Sustainability and international law in the East Asian context;
- New technologies and environmental sustainability;
- The role of NGOs and civil society in promoting sustainability;
- ESG, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility.
Guidelines for Submission
Manuscripts must be original contributions and not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Contributions must adhere to academic standards and may include empirical research, theoretical analysis, case studies, or policy evaluations.
Papers must be written in Italian or English and must follow the provided editorial guidelines of RIDAO and ECF.
Please submit an abstract (250-300 words) describing the proposed contribution along with details of the authors and affiliations.
Important Deadlines
Deadline for abstract submission: April 15, 2025
Notification of acceptance: April 30, 2025
Deadline for full paper submission: July 15, 2025
Publication details
Accepted contributions will undergo peer review.
For further information please write to redazione.ridao@unive.it.
Go to the upload area
https://peerflow.edizionicafoscari.it/abstracts/form/journal/31/368
Ethical Code of Rivista di Diritto dell’Asia Orientale
Rivista di Diritto dell’Asia Orientale (RIDAO) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal whose policy is inspired by the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Ethical Code. See the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Publisher’s responsibilities
The Publisher must provide the Journal with adequate resources and the guidance of experts, in order to carry out its role in the most professional way, aiming at the highest quality standard.
The Publisher must have a written agreement that defines the relationship with the owner of the Journal and/or the Editors-in-Chief. The agreement must comply with the Code of Behavior for Publishers of Scientific Journals, as established by COPE.
The relationship among the Editors-in-Chief, the Advisory Board and the Publisher is based on the principle of publishing independence.
Editors’ responsibilities
The Editors-in-Chief and the Advisory Board of RIDAO alone are responsible for the decision to publish the articles submitted.
Submitted articles, after having been checked for plagiarism by means of the anti-plagiarism software Compilatio that is used by the University and is made available to us, will be sent to at least two reviewers. Final acceptance presumes the implementation of possible amendments, as required by the reviewers and under the supervision of the RIDAO Editors-in-Chief.
The RIDAO Editors-in-Chief and Advisory Board must evaluate each submitted paper in compliance with the Journalʼs policy, i.e. exclusively on the basis of its scientific content, without discrimination of race, sex, gender, creed, ethnic origin, citizenship, or the scientific, academic and political position of the Authors.
Allegations of misconduct
If the RIDAO Editors-in-Chief and Advisory Board notice (or receive notifications of) mistakes or inaccuracies, conflict of interest or plagiarism in a published article, they will immediately warn the Author and the Publisher and will undertake the necessary actions to resolve the issue. They will do their best to correct the published content whenever they are informed that it contains scientific errors or that the authors have committed unethical or illegal acts in connection with their published work. If necessary, they will withdraw the article or publish a recantation.
All complaints are handled in accordance with the guidelines published by the COPE.
Concerns and complaints must be addressed to the following e-mail ecf_support@unive.it. The letter should contain the following information:
- complainant’s personal information;
- title, author(s), publication date, DOI;
- complaint(s);
- declaration that the complainant has no conflict of interest, or declaration of an actual or potential conflict of interest.
Authors’ responsibilities
Stylesheet
Authors must follow the Guidelines for Authors to be downloaded from the RIDAO website.
Authors must explicitly state that their work is original in all its parts and that the submitted paper has not been previously published, nor submitted to other journals, until the entire evaluation process is completed. Since no paper gets published without significant revision, earlier dissemination in conference proceedings or working papers does not preclude consideration for publication, but Authors are expected to fully disclose publication/dissemination of the material in other closely related publications, so that the overlap can be evaluated by the RIDAO Editors-in-Chief.
Authorship
Authors are strongly encouraged to use their ORCID iD when submitting a manuscript. This will ensure the authors’ visibility and correct citation of their work.
Authorship must be correctly attributed; all those who have given a substantial contribution to the design, organisation and accomplishment of the research the article is based on, must be indicated as Co-Authors. Please ensure that: the order of the author names is correct; the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that affiliations are up-to-date.
The respective roles of each co-author should be described in a footnote. The statement that all authors have approved the final version should be included in the disclosure.
Conflicts of interest and financing
Authors, under their own responsibility, must avoid any conflict of interest affecting the results obtained or the interpretations suggested. The RIDAO Editors-in-Chief will give serious and careful consideration to suggestions of cases in which, due to possible conflict of interest, an Author’s work should not be reviewed by a specific scholar. Authors should indicate any financing agency or the project the article stems from.
Quotations
Authors must see to it that all works consulted be properly quoted. If works or words of others are used, they have to be properly paraphrased or duly quoted. Quotations between “double quotes” (or «angled quotation marks» if the text is written in a language other than English) must reproduce the exact wording of the source; under their own responsibility, Authors should carefully refrain from disguising a restyling of the source’s wording, as though it was the original formulation.
Any form of excessive, inappropriate or unnecessary self-citation, as well as any other form of citation manipulation, are strongly discouraged.
Ethical Committee
Whenever required, the research protocols must be authorised in advance by the Ethical Committee of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
Emendations
When Authors find a mistake or an inaccuracy in their own article, they must immediately warn the RIDAO Editors-in-Chief, providing all the information needed to make the due adjustments.
Reviewers’ responsibilities
Goal
By means of the peer-review procedure, reviewers assist the RIDAO Editors-in-Chief and Advisory Board in taking decisions on the articles submitted. They are expected to offer the Authors suggestions as to possible adjustments aimed at improving their contribution submission.
Timing and conflicts of interest
If a reviewer does not feel up to the task of doing a given review, or if she/he is unable to read the work within the agreed schedule, she/he should notify the RIDAO Editors-in-Chief. Reviewers must not accept articles for which there is a conflict of interest due to previous contributions or to a competition with a disclosed author (or with an author they believe to have identified).
Confidentiality
The content of the reviewed work must be considered confidential and must not be used without explicit authorisation by the Author, who is to be contacted via the Editors-in-Chief. Any confidential information obtained during the peer review process should not be used for other purposes.
Collaborative attitude
Reviewers should see themselves not as adversaries but as advocates for the field. Any comment must be done in a collaborative way and from an objective point of view. Reviewers should clearly motivate their comments and keep in mind the Golden Rule of Reviewing: “Review for others as you would have others review for you”.
Plagiarism
Reviewers should report any similarity or overlapping of the work under analysis with other works known to them.