Journal | JoLMA
Journal issue | 4 | 2 | 2023
The philosophical reflection stemming from actual scientific practice has been proven to have the potential to inform ethical thinking and political practice with a more robust foundation than those not necessarily linked to scientific developments. This is not, of course, to argue for an alleged preeminence of science over speculative philosophical reflection, nor that scientific practices should remain untouched by science-informed philosophy. On the contrary, history and anthropology of science function as antidotes to similar unfounded views. Recent scientific and technological discoveries require a stronger role for philosophy in public and institutional discussions. Their practical consequences for humans and non-humans cannot be ignored.
Keywords Biopsychism • Memory • Generativity • New materialism • Self • Enactivism • Cognitive ontology • Evolution of cognition • Metaphilosophy • Pluralism • Unconventional Cognitive System • Animal cognition • Posthuman • Concepts • Social struggles • Unification • Cybernetics • Basal cognition • Computation • Microbiome • Environmental ethics • Plant Cognition • Biogenic approach • Relational Value • Anthropomorphism • Ontological Turn • Gut-brain axis • Philosophy of Mind • Animal ethics • Climate justice • Holism • Mind • Extending cognition • Zoopsychism • Cognition • Plant cognition • Multispecies justice • Posthumanism
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2023/02 | Published Dec. 20, 2023 | Language en
Copyright © Filippo Batisti. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.