Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017
edited by
abstract
The title of the Series «Sapere l’Europa, sapere d’Europa» voices the desire to investigate facets of the process of European integration without disregarding its most weighty, however controversial and bureaucratic, aspects, yet looking beyond them. The main intent is thus to make room for vision, feelings, imagination. In this fourth volume, Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017, the different profiles of the CH, tangible and intangible, are undoubtedly presented in an international and interdisciplinary perspective. Yet, as the constant reference to the Faro Convention proves, “practices, knowledge and collective traditions” – be they nested or not in the humus of Venice and the Veneto Region – still distinctively taste of Europe.
Bona fide purchaser • Folklore • Europe • Guilt • ICH • Certificate of free circulation • Ethnography • Access • Ruskin • Stigmatization • Cultural properties • Participation • Working tools • Faro Convention • Unesco • Cultural goods • Street performances • Participative approach • Destruction • Italian Colonialism • Commons • Contemporary conflicts • Indigenous people • Representations • Venetian craftsmanship • Cultural communities • Property • NGOs • Waterscapes • Heritage community • Fascism • Guardians • Animal Rights Movements • Cultural rights • Venice • Mining • Cultural • Religious heritage • Exclusion • Active Citizenship • Appropriation • Local communities • Restitution • Vernacular architecture • Right to participate in cultural life • Slovenia • Return • Ecosystems research • Regional law • Mediterranean • Life-long learning methods • Common good • Gondola’s heritagisation • Heritage Community • Management and governance • Politics of place • Gender • Intangible Cultural Heritage • Intentional destruction • Mexico • International art market • Local collective action • Digital • Tourism • Local CH • Right to take part in cultural life • Heritage politics • Dance • Social justice • Chorus • Legal and Social Anthropology • Cultural identity • Urban sprawl • Humanitarian law • Subject-object • Migrants’ rights • Digital culture • Heritage walk • Sephardic Jews • Social memory • Right to the (I)CH • Digital repatriation • Governance • Heritage practices • Stakeholders • Digital heritage • Ownership • Representation • Hydrography • Memory • Study circle • Dialogue • Ecomuseums • Biocultural paradigm • International law • Intangible • Terrorism • Cultural sustainability • Heritage • CH • Cultural property • Knowledge • Responsibility to protect • Communities • Agreement • Sharing and integration • Cultural heritage • Endangered heritage • Romani People • Cultural interest • Dalmatia • Scuola dalmata di San Giorgio e Trifone • Museums • Traditional Knowledge • Adult education • Human rights • Landscape • Tintoretto
permalink http://doi.org/10.14277/6969-052-5/SE-4