Journal |
Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale
Journal issue | 61 | 2025
Research Article | Abū Bakr al-Fūrakī, Unknown ašʿarite Reference to Averroes’ Treatise on Theology
Abū Bakr al-Fūrakī, Unknown ašʿarite Reference to Averroes’ Treatise on Theology
-
Barbara Canova
- Centre Jean Pépin CNRS (UMR 8230), France -
email
- Barbara Canova - Centre Jean Pépin CNRS (UMR 8230), France - email
Abstract
Averroes’ kalām treaty, the Kitāb al-kašf ʿan manāhiğ al-adilla is one of the most controversial texts from the Andalusian philosopher. Its writing relied vastly on Aristotelian texts and opuses from the aš‘arite kalām, of which Averroes wanted to deconstruct and refute the doctrines. Most of its references – whether they are Aristotelian or ašʿarite are not explicitly quoted – are consistent with the medieval Islamic customs. Having published between 2005 and 2007 an analysis of the Aristotelian sources of this text, this contribution aims at studying the ašʿarite authors critiqued by Averroes and broadly mentioned as the ‘modern ašʿarites’. The main source discovered through this textual comparison is the Kitāb al-Niẓāmī fī usūl ad-dīn by Abu-Bakr Al-Fūrakī, author of a kalām treaty of which a single copy has been conserved in Istanbul. A transcription and a translation of its most salient excerpts have been included in this contribution, in order to show the relationship between those two kalām treaties.
Submitted: April 11, 2025 | Accepted: June 30, 2025 | Published July 31, 2025 | Language: fr
Keywords Al-Andalus • Prophecy • Ibn Rušd • Almohades • Aš‘arism • Kalām
Copyright © 2025 Barbara Canova. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/AnnOr/2385-3042/2025/01/002
Articoli
-
The Symbolism of Nature in the Mamluk Munāẓara: A Study of Some Floral Literary Debates
-
Arianna Tondi
- July 31, 2025
-
Abū Bakr al-Fūrakī, Unknown ašʿarite Reference to Averroes’ Treatise on Theology
-
Barbara Canova
- July 31, 2025
-
Toward an Ethospoetics of the Islamic Languages
Re-Reading Multilingualism Along the Silk Road According to Alessandro Bausani ‒ Part I
-
Chiara Fontana
- July 31, 2025
-
The Burial of Muslims in a Non-Islamic Context between Theory and Practice
First Investigation into the Campania Case
-
Carlo De Angelo
- July 31, 2025
-
A Village on the Outskirts of the Ottoman Empire: Archaeological Research at Tell Zeyd
-
Cristina Tonghini,
Jacopo Boschini,
Stefano Palalidis,
Mette Bangsborg Thuesen
- July 31, 2025
-
Reviving Ara the Handsome
Exploring the Protohistoric, Urartian, Orontid, and Medieval Armenian heritage of Aralesk/Kalecik in Van, Turkey
-
Roberto Dan
- July 31, 2025
-
Hints of Martiality in Buddhist Sources in the Pāli Language: Reflections on the Basis of Some Historical-Artistic Elements from Gandhāra
-
Bryan De Notariis
- July 31, 2025
-
The Linguistic Heritage of the Bangladeshi ‘New Communities’ of Venice (Italy)
Between Italian and Bangla and Beyond
-
Giulia Ferro
- July 31, 2025
-
From Organics to Ceramics?
Exploring Organic Skeuomorphism in the Later Neolithic in Northern China
-
Nigel Wood
- July 31, 2025
-
Archaeobotany in China
History of the Discipline and Future Prospects
-
Rita Dal Martello,
Rita Dal Martello
- July 31, 2025
-
Xiong Shili in Conversation: Transcultural Epistolary Exchange on the Daodejing
-
Linda Anna Pietrasanta
- July 31, 2025
-
Mapping Referents in Chinese and Italian: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Anaphora, Deixis, and Other Referential Relations
-
Anna Morbiato
- July 31, 2025
-
Optative namu and its Variant namo in Old Japanese Sources
-
Giovanni Pasa
- July 31, 2025
-
Ancient Roman Antiquity in the Italian Landscape and the Reception of Roman History in Modern Japan (1868-1912)
-
Yuko Fukuyama,
Myriam Pilutti Namer
- July 31, 2025
-
An SVG-Based Approach for the Development of a Kanji Auto Assessment System
-
Alessandro Mantelli
- July 31, 2025
Review
-
ʿAmr ibn Mattā al-Ṭīrhānī. Il libro della torre
-
Sebastiano Siviero
- July 31, 2025
-
Decolonising Environmental Humanities through Indigenous and Local Perspectives
-
Deepika Gupta
- July 31, 2025
-
Marco Fumian. Leggere la Cina, Capire il Mondo: Narrazioni dominanti e discorso critico in un’era di competizione
-
Dario Di Conzo
- July 31, 2025
Articoli
- The Symbolism of Nature in the Mamluk Munāẓara: A Study of Some Floral Literary Debates
- Arianna Tondi
- July 31, 2025
- Abū Bakr al-Fūrakī, Unknown ašʿarite Reference to Averroes’ Treatise on Theology
- Barbara Canova
- July 31, 2025
-
Toward an Ethospoetics of the Islamic Languages
Re-Reading Multilingualism Along the Silk Road According to Alessandro Bausani ‒ Part I - Chiara Fontana
- July 31, 2025
-
The Burial of Muslims in a Non-Islamic Context between Theory and Practice
First Investigation into the Campania Case - Carlo De Angelo
- July 31, 2025
- A Village on the Outskirts of the Ottoman Empire: Archaeological Research at Tell Zeyd
- Cristina Tonghini, Jacopo Boschini, Stefano Palalidis, Mette Bangsborg Thuesen
- July 31, 2025
-
Reviving Ara the Handsome
Exploring the Protohistoric, Urartian, Orontid, and Medieval Armenian heritage of Aralesk/Kalecik in Van, Turkey - Roberto Dan
- July 31, 2025
- Hints of Martiality in Buddhist Sources in the Pāli Language: Reflections on the Basis of Some Historical-Artistic Elements from Gandhāra
- Bryan De Notariis
- July 31, 2025
-
The Linguistic Heritage of the Bangladeshi ‘New Communities’ of Venice (Italy)
Between Italian and Bangla and Beyond - Giulia Ferro
- July 31, 2025
-
From Organics to Ceramics?
Exploring Organic Skeuomorphism in the Later Neolithic in Northern China - Nigel Wood
- July 31, 2025
-
Archaeobotany in China
History of the Discipline and Future Prospects - Rita Dal Martello, Rita Dal Martello
- July 31, 2025
- Xiong Shili in Conversation: Transcultural Epistolary Exchange on the Daodejing
- Linda Anna Pietrasanta
- July 31, 2025
- Mapping Referents in Chinese and Italian: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Anaphora, Deixis, and Other Referential Relations
- Anna Morbiato
- July 31, 2025
- Optative namu and its Variant namo in Old Japanese Sources
- Giovanni Pasa
- July 31, 2025
- Ancient Roman Antiquity in the Italian Landscape and the Reception of Roman History in Modern Japan (1868-1912)
- Yuko Fukuyama, Myriam Pilutti Namer
- July 31, 2025
- An SVG-Based Approach for the Development of a Kanji Auto Assessment System
- Alessandro Mantelli
- July 31, 2025
Review
- ʿAmr ibn Mattā al-Ṭīrhānī. Il libro della torre
- Sebastiano Siviero
- July 31, 2025
- Decolonising Environmental Humanities through Indigenous and Local Perspectives
- Deepika Gupta
- July 31, 2025
- Marco Fumian. Leggere la Cina, Capire il Mondo: Narrazioni dominanti e discorso critico in un’era di competizione
- Dario Di Conzo
- July 31, 2025
DC Field
Value
dc.identifier
ECF_article_24783
dc.title
Abū Bakr al-Fūrakī, Unknown ašʿarite Reference to Averroes’ Treatise on Theology
dc.contributor.author
Canova Barbara
dc.publisher
Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Venice University Press, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.type
Research Article
dc.language.iso
fr
dc.identifier.uri
http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/riviste/annali-di-ca-foscari-serie-orientale/2025/1/abu-bakr-al-furaki-reference-asarite-inconnue-du-t/
dc.description.abstract
Averroes’ kalām treaty, the Kitāb al-kašf ʿan manāhiğ al-adilla is one of the most controversial texts from the Andalusian philosopher. Its writing relied vastly on Aristotelian texts and opuses from the aš‘arite kalām, of which Averroes wanted to deconstruct and refute the doctrines. Most of its references – whether they are Aristotelian or ašʿarite are not explicitly quoted – are consistent with the medieval Islamic customs. Having published between 2005 and 2007 an analysis of the Aristotelian sources of this text, this contribution aims at studying the ašʿarite authors critiqued by Averroes and broadly mentioned as the ‘modern ašʿarites’. The main source discovered through this textual comparison is the Kitāb al-Niẓāmī fī usūl ad-dīn by Abu-Bakr Al-Fūrakī, author of a kalām treaty of which a single copy has been conserved in Istanbul. A transcription and a translation of its most salient excerpts have been included in this contribution, in order to show the relationship between those two kalām treaties.
dc.relation.ispartof
Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale
dc.relation.ispartof
Vol. 61 | June 2025
dc.issued
2025-07-31
dc.dateAccepted
2025-06-30
dc.dateSubmitted
2025-04-11
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.eissn
2385-3042
dc.rights
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.identifier.doi
10.30687/AnnOr/2385-3042/2025/01/002
dc.peer-review
yes
dc.subject
Al-Andalus
dc.subject
Almohades
dc.subject
Aš‘arism
dc.subject
Ibn Rušd
dc.subject
Kalām
dc.subject
Prophecy
Download data
| DC Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
dc.identifier |
ECF_article_24783 |
|
dc.title |
Abū Bakr al-Fūrakī, Unknown ašʿarite Reference to Averroes’ Treatise on Theology |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Canova Barbara |
|
dc.publisher |
Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Venice University Press, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari |
|
dc.type |
Research Article |
|
dc.language.iso |
fr |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/riviste/annali-di-ca-foscari-serie-orientale/2025/1/abu-bakr-al-furaki-reference-asarite-inconnue-du-t/ |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Averroes’ kalām treaty, the Kitāb al-kašf ʿan manāhiğ al-adilla is one of the most controversial texts from the Andalusian philosopher. Its writing relied vastly on Aristotelian texts and opuses from the aš‘arite kalām, of which Averroes wanted to deconstruct and refute the doctrines. Most of its references – whether they are Aristotelian or ašʿarite are not explicitly quoted – are consistent with the medieval Islamic customs. Having published between 2005 and 2007 an analysis of the Aristotelian sources of this text, this contribution aims at studying the ašʿarite authors critiqued by Averroes and broadly mentioned as the ‘modern ašʿarites’. The main source discovered through this textual comparison is the Kitāb al-Niẓāmī fī usūl ad-dīn by Abu-Bakr Al-Fūrakī, author of a kalām treaty of which a single copy has been conserved in Istanbul. A transcription and a translation of its most salient excerpts have been included in this contribution, in order to show the relationship between those two kalām treaties. |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Vol. 61 | June 2025 |
|
dc.issued |
2025-07-31 |
|
dc.dateAccepted |
2025-06-30 |
|
dc.dateSubmitted |
2025-04-11 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
|
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
2385-3042 |
|
dc.rights |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License |
|
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.30687/AnnOr/2385-3042/2025/01/002 |
|
dc.peer-review |
yes |
|
dc.subject |
Al-Andalus |
|
dc.subject |
Almohades |
|
dc.subject |
Aš‘arism |
|
dc.subject |
Ibn Rušd |
|
dc.subject |
Kalām |
|
dc.subject |
Prophecy |
| Download data |