Presentazione
La collana, diretta da Lucio Milano, è dedicata agli studi sul mondo antico e tardo-antico. Essa è destinata ad ospitare pubblicazioni che scaturiscono dalle attività di ricerca di Ca’ Foscari e pubblicazioni di studiosi e istituzioni italiane e straniere che contribuiscano a mettere in evidenza la rete delle collaborazioni nazionali e internazionali dell’Ateneo in ambito antichistico. È suddivisa in quattro sezioni: Storia ed epigrafia; Archeologia; Orientalistica; Filologia e letteratura.
Permalink doi.org | e-ISSN 2610-9344 | ISSN 2610-8828 | Lingua en, fr, it | ANCE E233745
Sottoserie
Archeologia
e-ISSN
2610-9344
ISSN
2610-8828
Filologia e letteratura
e-ISSN
2610-9352
ISSN
2610-8836
Storia ed epigrafia
e-ISSN
2610-8291
ISSN
2610-8801
Studi orientali
e-ISSN
2610-9336
ISSN
2610-881X
Copyright This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Ultimo volume pubblicato
The volume Wine Cultures. Gandhāra and Beyond represents the primary outcome of the MALIWI project (SPIN Ca’ Foscari 2021) directed by Claudia Antonetti. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach, this work seeks to explore the production techniques, social functions, and cultural significance of intoxicating drinks with particular reference to wine – an extraordinary beverage that has been intertwined with human history for millennia. This volume gathers contributions by scholars interested in studying wine and drinking culture in Gandhāra and neighbouring regions, including Ancient Assyria, Arachosia, and present-day India. The topic is explored from three fundamental perspectives, employing a diverse range of sources, including literary and historical texts, as well as linguistic, iconographic, archaeological, and anthropological evidence.
L’anomalie nécessaire
18 Luglio 2024
Il corpo spezzato
24 Giugno 2024
Un monde partagé : la Sicile du premier siècle av. J.-C. entre Diodore et Cicéron
19 Dicembre 2023
Wisdom Between East and West: Mesopotamia, Greece and Beyond
09 Luglio 2024
La necropoli di Opitergium
30 Maggio 2023
Figlio del lampo, degno di un re. Un cavallo veneto e la sua bardatura
16 Dicembre 2022
Libertatis dulcedo
04 Febbraio 2022
Paulo maiora canamus
14 Dicembre 2021
ΦΑΙΔΙΜΟΣ ΕΚΤΩΡ
16 Dicembre 2021
Headscarf and Veiling
30 Agosto 2021
Stolen Heritage
31 Marzo 2021
Corpus of Nabataean Aramaic-Greek Inscriptions
26 Aprile 2021
Administration at Girsu in Gudea’s Time
03 Giugno 2020
Life in Nuzi’s Suburbs
21 Maggio 2020
La falsificazione epigrafica
16 Dicembre 2019
Altera pars laboris
11 Dicembre 2019
Il dono di Altino
16 Dicembre 2019
Agrippina Maggiore
03 Dicembre 2019
L’anima delle cose
23 Novembre 2019
Élites e cultura
06 Luglio 2019
Prima dello scavo
20 Novembre 2018
The Unwound Yarn
04 Luglio 2018
Personal Names in the Aramaic Inscriptions of Hatra
18 Maggio 2018
Seleucid Tablets from Uruk in the British Museum
05 Aprile 2018
Epigrafia ostiense dopo il CIL. 2000 iscrizioni funerarie
26 Gennaio 2023
Strumenti digitali e collaborativi per le Scienze dell’Antichità
29 Novembre 2017
Certissima signa
01 Settembre 2017
The City of Ebla
13 Giugno 2017
Languages, Objects, and the Transmission of Rituals
12 Luglio 2017
L’edificio protopalaziale dell’Acropoli Mediana di Festòs (Vani CV-CVII)
01 Marzo 2017
The Reception of Sumerian Literature in the Western Periphery
08 Luglio 2016
Commensality and Ceremonial Meals in the Neo-Assyrian Period
30 Dicembre 2015
La lupa sul Nilo
20 Febbraio 2015
Antichità egizie e Italia
13 Gennaio 2015
Storia e storie della lingua greca
10 Dicembre 2014
Poteri e legittimità nel mondo antico
25 Novembre 2014
Festòs protopalaziale
01 Ottobre 2013
Aspetti del sistema preposizionale dell’eblaita
01 Aprile 2013
Microstorie di romanizzazione
30 Marzo 2013
Per sottoporre una proposta di pubblicazione utilizza il form qui disponibile.
Submit a proposalinput
I costi di pubblicazioni sono regolamentati dall’Editore. Tutte le informazioni sono disponibili alla pagina Pubblicare con noi.
La collana adotta, come modalità di peer review di riferimento, la double blind.
Pertanto, le opere pubblicate hanno ottenuto il parere favorevole da parte di almeno due valutatori esperti della materia, attraverso un processo di revisione anonima (double-blind peer review) condotto sotto la responsabilità della Direzione scientifica della collana. I revisori non hanno contatti diretti con gli Autori e appartengono a istituzioni di ricerca diverse da quella cui la collana è affiliata.
È possibile che la collana adotti, in casi più rari, altri tipi di processi di referaggio, come ad esempio la open review, ovvero una revisione non anonima, oppure una revisione mista che coinvolge un membro del Comitato scientifico e un valutatore esterno. Tali opzioni sono determinate dalle caratteristiche specifiche della ricerca oggetto della pubblicazione, o da altri fattori peculiari che determinano la maggior efficacia delle alternative qui segnalate.
La valutazione è svolta in conformità e aderenza ai criteri scientifici, e ai criteri editoriali di completezza bibliografica e coerenza formale di Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.
Politiche di revisione per le singole sezioni:
Per una descrizione dettagliata del processo, si prega di consultare la pagina: Certificazione scientifica.
Ethical Code of Antichistica
Antichistica is a peer-reviewed scientific book series whose policy is inspired by the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Ethical Code.
Publisher’s responsibilities
The Publisher must provide the Book Series with adequate resources and the guidance of experts, in order to carry out its role in the most professional way, aiming at the highest quality standard.
The Publisher must have a written agreement that defines the relationship with the owner of the Book Series and/or the Editor-in-Chief. The agreement must comply with the Code of Behavior for Publishers of Scientific Journals, as established by COPE.
The relationship among the Editor-in-Chief, the Advisory Board and the Publisher is based on the principle of publishing independence.
Editors’ responsibilities
The Editor-in-Chief and the Advisory Board of Antichistica alone are responsible for the decision to publish the submitted works.
Submitted works, after having been checked for plagiarism by means of the anti-plagiarism software Compilatio that is used by the University and is made available to us, will be sent to at least two reviewers. Final acceptance presumes the implementation of possible amendments, as required by the reviewers and under the supervision of the Antichistica Editor-in-Chief.
The Antichistica Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board must evaluate each submitted paper in compliance with the Book Seriesʼ policy, i.e. exclusively on the basis of its scientific content, without discrimination of race, sex, gender, creed, ethnic origin, citizenship, or the scientific, academic and political position of the Authors.
Allegations of misconduct
If the Antichistica Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board notice (or receive notifications of) mistakes or inaccuracies, conflict of interest or plagiarism in a published book, they will immediately warn the Author and the Publisher and will undertake the necessary actions to resolve the issue. They will do their best to correct the published content whenever they are informed that it contains scientific errors or that the authors have committed unethical or illegal acts in connection with their published work. If necessary, they will withdraw the book or publish a recantation.
All complaints are handled in accordance with the guidelines published by the COPE.
Concerns and complaints must be addressed to the following e-mail ecf_support@unive.it. The letter should contain the following information:
Authors’ responsibilities
Stylesheet
Authors must follow the Guidelines for Authors to be downloaded from the Antichistica website.
Authors must explicitly state that their work is original in all its parts and that the submitted paper has not been previously published, nor submitted to other publishers, until the entire evaluation process is completed. Since no paper or book gets published without significant revision, earlier dissemination in conference proceedings or working papers does not preclude consideration for publication, but Authors are expected to fully disclose publication/dissemination of the material in other closely related publications, so that the overlap can be evaluated by the Antichistica Editor-in-Chief.
Authorship
Authors are strongly encouraged to use their ORCID iD when submitting a manuscript. This will ensure the authors’ visibility and correct citation of their work.
Authorship must be correctly attributed; all those who have given a substantial contribution to the design, organisation and accomplishment of the research the book is based on, must be indicated as Co-Authors. Please ensure that: the order of the author names is correct; the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that affiliations are up-to-date.
The respective roles of each co-author should be described in a footnote. The statement that all authors have approved the final version should be included in the disclosure.
Conflicts of interest and financing
Authors, under their own responsibility, must avoid any conflict of interest affecting the results obtained or the interpretations suggested. The Antichistica Editor-in-Chief will give serious and careful consideration to suggestions of cases in which, due to possible conflict of interest, an Author’s work should not be reviewed by a specific scholar. Authors should indicate any financing agency or the project the book stems from.
Quotations
Authors must see to it that all works consulted be properly quoted. If works or words of others are used, they have to be properly paraphrased or duly quoted. Quotations between “double quotes” (or «angled quotation marks» if the text is written in a language other than English) must reproduce the exact wording of the source; under their own responsibility, Authors should carefully refrain from disguising a restyling of the source’s wording, as though it was the original formulation.
Any form of excessive, inappropriate or unnecessary self-citation, as well as any other form of citation manipulation, are strongly discouraged.
Ethical Committee
Whenever required, the research protocols must be authorised in advance by the Ethical Committee of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
Emendations
When Authors find a mistake or an inaccuracy in their own work, they must immediately warn the Antichistica Editor-in-Chief, providing all the information needed to make the due adjustments.
Reviewers’ responsibilities
Goal
By means of the peer-review procedure, reviewers assist the Antichistica Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board in taking decisions on the submitted works. They are expected to offer the Authors suggestions as to possible adjustments aimed at improving their contribution submission.
Timing and conflicts of interest
If a reviewer does not feel up to the task of doing a given review, or if she/he is unable to read the work within the agreed schedule, she/he should notify the Antichistica Editor-in-Chief. Reviewers must not accept texts for which there is a conflict of interest due to previous contributions or to a competition with a disclosed author (or with an author they believe to have identified).
Confidentiality
The content of the reviewed work must be considered confidential and must not be used without explicit authorisation by the Author, who is to be contacted via the editor-in-chief. Any confidential information obtained during the peer review process should not be used for other purposes.
Collaborative attitude
Reviewers should see themselves not as adversaries but as advocates for the field. Any comment must be done in a collaborative way and from an objective point of view. Reviewers should clearly motivate their comments and keep in mind the Golden Rule of Reviewing: “Review for others as you would have others review for you”.
Plagiarism
Reviewers should report any similarity or overlapping of the work under analysis with other works known to them.
Edizioni Ca’ Foscari
Dorsoduro 3246
30123 Venezia
ecf@unive.it
T +39 041 234 8250
Evologi srl
P.IVA 04616450260